<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commanding Hypnosis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benwhite.me/2009/10/commanding-hypnosis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benwhite.me/2009/10/commanding-hypnosis/</link>
	<description>...Anything&#039;s possible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.benwhite.me/2009/10/commanding-hypnosis/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benwhite.me/?p=76#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Surely the only way a subject could &#039;expect&#039; a mixture of both was if they were a hypnotist? IMO, the fastest approach is the direct approach surely? By chucking in conversational style, you&#039;re only diluting the direct method? Sure its not going to work for everyone, but then neither is the conversational...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the only way a subject could &#8216;expect&#8217; a mixture of both was if they were a hypnotist? IMO, the fastest approach is the direct approach surely? By chucking in conversational style, you&#8217;re only diluting the direct method? Sure its not going to work for everyone, but then neither is the conversational&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.benwhite.me/2009/10/commanding-hypnosis/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benwhite.me/?p=76#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Ah,...but what if the subject &#039;expects&#039; a mixture of both (due to their own model of Hypnosis or what they think Hypnosis is about from what they have seen, heard etc) ..then I think the mixture of both would be the best/fastest way to go!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah,&#8230;but what if the subject &#8216;expects&#8217; a mixture of both (due to their own model of Hypnosis or what they think Hypnosis is about from what they have seen, heard etc) ..then I think the mixture of both would be the best/fastest way to go!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.benwhite.me/2009/10/commanding-hypnosis/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benwhite.me/?p=76#comment-5</guid>
		<description>They both have their places - the point I&#039;m trying to make, I think, is that mixing conversational with direct is only going to add to the amount of work you need to do and reduce the effectiveness of your suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They both have their places &#8211; the point I&#8217;m trying to make, I think, is that mixing conversational with direct is only going to add to the amount of work you need to do and reduce the effectiveness of your suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.benwhite.me/2009/10/commanding-hypnosis/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benwhite.me/?p=76#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Although I prefer conversational overall, i do think direct approach is more street worthy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I prefer conversational overall, i do think direct approach is more street worthy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

